|
Standards
Addressed by Lesson: Reading and Writing
Standard 4 : Students apply thinking
skills to their reading, writing, speaking, listening,
and viewing.
Objectives
of Lesson: |
Students
explore the concepts of violence and nonviolence
and understand the links between violence happening
in their personal lives and conflict taking place
on a global level. Students also see the connections
between nonviolence personally and globally.
|
Instructional
Strategies: |
Brainstorming,
guided reading, group discussion
|
Vocabulary:
|
Violence,
nonviolence
|
|
Suggested
Resources to Obtain: |
-
PeaceJam Teacher's Resource Guide ,
PeaceJam
-
Teaching Peace, A Guide for the Classroom
and Everyday Life , By Leah Wells, Santa
Barbara : Nuclear Age Peace Foundation, 2003
-
Delegation Pedagogy Manual , Witness
for Peace, 2000
|
|
Suggested
Time: |
Between
50 and 60 minutes
|
|
Materials
Needed: |
-
Newsprint,
markers
-
Copies of
Article (from Solutions to Violence
)
|
Attachments:
|
A
. Icebreaker
B.
Brainstorm responses on violence/nonviolence
C.
Some responses to lesson on interconnectedness
activity
D.
Article: “If We Listen Well” by Edward Guinan
( Solutions to Violence , Colman McCarthy,
ed. Center for Teaching Peace) |
Lesson
Outline
Introduction
to Lesson:
Define
the course by explaining to students: The goal of this
course is not to convince you of anything but to encourage
you to think critically and truly reflect on the issues
of violence and the possibilities of nonviolent choices,
and the meaning and implications of both. The ideas
of incessant war making and violence are so prevalent
in our history and the current context of our world
that it is important to counter this with another reality
and look to alternatives such as peace and nonviolence
that ALSO make up a part of human history. If we want
to work toward peaceful societies, we must teach peace.
The literature on nonviolence is rich. If peace is what
every government on earth says it seeks and if peace
is the yearning of every heart, then why aren't we learning
it in schools?
This
is a student-centered, participatory course where your
voice, input, suggestions, and comments are necessary
to create a learning community. Although I am a facilitator
of this experience, I am not an expert in the field
and I am also here to learn about these issues through
our readings, discussions, exercises, and activities.
This
lesson begins with some questions, followed by a few
activities that will encourage us to think about and
discuss personal violence as well as violence experienced
both locally and globally.
Icebreaker
/ Quick Activity to Assess Prior Learning:
If
this first lesson is part of a semester-long series,
it is good to start off with some good vibes and positive
energy with an activity that is fun and engages everyone!
The following activity can take from 5 to 10 minutes.
Icebreaker
Activity - I've Got Mail (see attachment A at end of
lesson plan)
Setting
up Class Norms:
Before
getting started with the class, create agreed upon norms
the group feels should be followed throughout the semester.
Using newsprint, brainstorm class norms. This newsprint
may be kept and brought out to look at from time to
time just to remind the group of some of "their"
guidelines.
Some
things the group may decide on are:
- Respect diverse
opinions
- Don't interrupt
when others speak
- Be on time
to class
- Listen to
others when they speak
- Reflect on
the material being discussed
- Honesty
- Participate
- Have fun
- Be open to
opinions that are different than your own; this is
when the greatest learning can take place!
- Learn about
oneself
- Be kind to
others
- Treat each
other fairly
- Practice what
we are learning
- Be gentle
when disagreeing with what is being said
If
it hasn't been put up on the list remind students this
is a student-centered class with participatory discussions
and that they are also teachers. Let them know that
your role is to teach as well as to facilitate.
Activities
Activity
1:
Examining Violence
in Our Own Lives
Begin
the discussion by telling students it is important to
take a look at violence and its impact on our own lives.
Ask students to stand up if they fit any of the categories
that you mention. Once students stand, thank them and
then ask everyone to sit down to listen to the next
statement. Found in: Wells, Leah, Teaching
Peace, A Guide for the Classroom and Everyday Life ,
Santa Barbara : Nuclear Age Peace Foundation, 2003.
Categories
- You have felt
that it was not always safe in the neighborhood around
your school.
- You have made
changes in your daily life – changing friends, avoiding
certain parks and playgrounds and changing routes
home to avoid violence.
- In the past
three years, someone has threatened you, a family
member or a friend.
- Someone has
picked a fight with you, one of your family members
or friends.
- Someone you
know personally has had someone pull a knife on him/her.
- Someone you
know personally has been in a situation where a gun
was used threateningly.
- Someone you
know has been a victim of family violence.
Discussion
Questions:
1.
What does this tell you about our own lives?
2.
How do you think teenagers in other parts of Colorado
or the U.S. would respond to these categories?
Share
with the students the following statistics from teenagers
in a 1995 Harris Poll called “Between Hope and Fear:
Teens Speak Out on Crime and the Community.”
•
40% felt that it was not always safe
in the neighborhood around their schools.
•
46% have made changes in their daily
lives – changing friends, avoiding certain parks
and playgrounds and changing routes home.
Activity
2:
Brainstorm on Violence
vs. Nonviolence
Put
up two sheets of newsprint (or use the board) and put
up the words violence and nonviolence asking students
to list words that define these terms. See brainstorm
list from students for ideas (Attachment B). Found in:
Wells, Leah, Teaching Peace, A Guide for the Classroom
and Everyday Life , Santa Barbara : Nuclear Age
Peace Foundation, 2003.
At
the end of the brainstorm, educator might want to ask
the students to take a look at the list they came up
with. Are there any comments they want to make? Any
observations from the lists they want to share?
Some
comments the educator might want to make (depending
on the list):
- Some of what
is up on the brainstorm lists has to do with personal
attitudes, how we interact with others.
- Nonviolence
involves working together (if words like sharing,
team work, unity, compromise, etc. are up on the list).
- Many of the
items on the violence list stem from a general state
of insecurity. (In the next exercise, students will
see that these personal attitudes that define violence
and nonviolence have global implications.)
Now
that we have a clearer understanding about what these
concepts encompass, this next exercise will get us to
think about violence on personal, community, and global
levels.
Activity
3:
Lesson on Interconnectedness
This
exercise involves a spiraling diagram. Start by labeling
a point on the chalkboard with the word “me.” What kinds
of conflict and/or violence can an individual personally
experience? Common answers are conflict within oneself,
with parents, friends, teachers, significant others,
coaches, bosses, etc. Found in: Wells, Leah, Teaching
Peace, A Guide for the Classroom and Everyday Life ,
Santa Barbara : Nuclear Age Peace Foundation, 2003.
Write
the responses on the board and, once that list is exhausted,
draw a spiral around those words and label another point
“my community.” Where does violence occur in the community?
At school? In the neighborhood? With the police or other
local authorities? Are there instances of environmental
violence or conflict in the area? Are there particular
issues that involve community conflict? Interesting
responses have been road rage, pollution, domestic violence,
gang activity, and police brutality, but by no means
is this a comprehensive list.
Draw
another spiral around those responses, and label another
point “my country.” Where is there violence in the country?
What kinds of situations, like child labor, poverty,
freedom of speech and assembly, weapons making, and
homelessness, can the students identify as being conflicts
within their country?
Finally,
draw the final spiral around these responses, and mark
a point labeled “my world.” Have students list conflicts
or instances of violence transpiring across the globe.
Students often list conflicts in terms of wars, i.e.
where violence is actively occurring. Encourage them
to think about what wars mean for the people involved
and if the types of conflicts already listed also exist
at the global level. This part of the exercise should
provide the final visual component for the students
to recognize that the conflicts they experience on a
personal level spiral outward to a global level.
Discussion
Questions:
1.
What stands out to you when we look at the chart we've
made?
2.
Do the types of personal violence which we said exist
on a personal level contribute or cause the violence
in our communities, nation, and work, or vice versa?
If so, how?
3.
Are there similarities between violence on a global
level and what we said happened in our country? community?
personal lives? Describe them.
4.
Remembering what our list of nonviolence looked like,
would our spiral look different if these principles
were prevalent in our personal lives? in our country?
How?
Activity
4:
Group Reading
This
class can be closed with students reading “ If We Listen
Well” by Edward Guinan. Give each student an article
and go around in a circle so that each paragraph is
read by a different student. Found in: Solutions
to Violence , Colman McCarthy ed. Center for Teaching
Peace. Found at: http://www.salsa.net/peace/conv/index.html
Optional
Activities:
This
class may be started with the Nonviolence Barometer
exercise (see exercises in Unit One Lesson Two). It
can then be done again at the end of the semester so
that students can see how their opinions changed after
the semester of readings, discussions, and activities.
Helpful
Hints / Comments from Previous Facilitators:
As
violence is so prevalent in our lives and what we learn,
it was easier for students to define violence rather
than nonviolence; their violence list was much longer.
This may be the case with other groups as well, so some
encouragement may be needed with the nonviolence list.
If so, point this out to the class and reassure then
that the nonviolence list can be just as long or longer
and give them more time to come up with responses. Looking
at the violence and identifying contrasting conditions
may be helpful.
DJPC
2004
Attachment
A: I've Got Mail Icebreaker
Set
Up: Make sure there is one less chair than
there are people in the group.
Procedure:
Have facilitator of group begin so students have an
example of how activity is done. Facilitator stands
in front of the group and says his or her name, where
he or she is from and a personal fact about himself
or herself.
Facilitator then says, “I've got mail.”
Group responds, “for whom?”
Facilitator says, “For all people who have blue eyes”(or
those who are wearing jeans, or name any characteristic
that will apply to at least a few in the group).
Those in the group to whom this applies get up and have
to change seats.
The person left standing now takes the place of the
facilitator and starts out with procedure number 1.
This continues until all students have had the opportunity
to get up and say something about themselves.
Attachment
B: Brainstorm Responses on Violence/Nonviolence
Violence
Physical
confrontation
Negative
emotional response
Acting
on anger
Survival
Ruthlessness
Learned
violence
Neglect
Product
of environment
Fear
Pain
Intolerance
Chaos
Vindictiveness
Insecurity
Paranoia
Being
threatening
Prejudice
Hatred
Denial
Greed
Silence
Control
Intimidation
Abuse
Poverty
Hunger
Torture
Conflict
One
force overpowering another
Nonviolence
Love
Patience
Tolerance
Understanding
Perseverance
Fearlessness
Teaching
Charity
Letting
go
Companionship
Transformation
Peace
Communication
Courage
Freedom
Justice
Teamwork
Unity
Sharing
Compromise
Humility
Trust
Assertiveness
Generosity
Joy
Truth
Kindness
Respect
Creativity
Attachment
C: Responses to Lesson on Interconnectedness Activity
ME
self-pity
can't be yourself
worthlessness
self-blame
gossip
fighting with family
self-hate
fighting with friends
suppressed anger
disempowered
being uninformed
ignoring violence
lack of responsibility
feeling lonely
feeling unaccepted
arguments
COMMUNITY
uninformed
domestic violence
vandalism
gang activity
police brutality
lack of natural resources
apathy
road rage
overuse of resources
environmental racism
NATION/WORLD
money
politics
power
war
Bush
drugs
hunger
poverty
homelessness
helplessness
media
Attachment
D: Article
If
We Listen Well
By
Edward Guinan
For
too long we have considered peace as the absence of
conflict. We have approached the issue wit this limited
perspective and have directed our attention to the prevailing
conflict of the moment, attempting to discover ways
of reducing the destructiveness of the event. This approach
is both necessary and desirable, but insufficient as
we continue to approach the problem in a fragmented
and isolated way. We continue to deal in symptomatic
terms as if war and destruction and violence are the
extensions and natural outgrowths of malignant attitudes,
values, relationships, and beliefs that we continue
to embrace.
Peace
Conflict
will always be an integral part of human life but our
methods of dealing with it need to change. We must be
willing to develop and ongoing critical view of our
values, operating premises and relationships, and a
sensitivity to those about us.
Peace
demands that one anticipate the effects of his views
and actions on others and the unifying or destructive
effects they may have. Most importantly one comes to
realize that the "end" does not justify the
"means": we get what we do, not what we hope
for or intend. You cannot improve a man through punishment,
nor can you bring peace through war or brotherhood through
brutalization.
Finally
one comes to appreciate the reality that there can be
not "we's" and "they's" in our lives
but only brothers and sisters - all children of God
- all sacred and dignified. Destruction of any one t=of
these God-gifts means a certain destruction of oneself,
and a mystery that is gone forever from this small,
fragile world.
Violence
Violence
can be seen as destructive communication. Any adequate
definition must include physical, verbal, symbolic,
psychological and spiritual displays of hostility and
hatred. The definition must include both our acts and
our inactions and that which is done directly to people
or indirectly to them through what they esteem. Many
forms will take on a combination of these characteristics.
Violence
should then include physical acts against another (i.e.,
the range of acts from personal attack to war which
violate human autonomy and integrity); verbal attacks
that demean and humiliate; symbolic acts that evoke
fear and hostility; psychological attitudes that deny
one's humanity and equality (legal, institutional, and
moral); spiritual postures that communicate racism,
inferiority, and worthlessness (i.e., beliefs and values
that demean or categorize). Violence then becomes a
dynamic rather than merely an act.
Hunger,
poverty, squalor, privilege, powerlessness, riches,
despair, and vicarious living are forms of violence
- forms that a society approves and perpetuates. We
have been too willing to discuss violence in terms of
ghetto uprisings, student unrest, street thievery, and
trashing, and have been unwilling to direct our attention
to the more pathological types of violence that are
acceptable - the types that daily crush the humanity
and life from untold millions of brothers and sisters.
In
the sixties we spoke with alarm of the "increase
of violence" in our society, which may have been
a half-truth; violence became more democratic in the
decade of the sixties. Instead of resting exclusively
with those who construct and maintain ghettos, keep
food from the mouths of children, and coerce the young
through educational programming and into war, violence
became the tool of a widely divergent group seeking
equality, power and redress.
Under
the umbrella of violence there reside two distinctively
different phenomena. First, there is the violence of
men and women who act out of frustration, hopelessness
and anger in an attempted grasp at life - the act of
the slave breaking the chains, which is understandable
and inevitable as long as some humans are in bondage.
The other type of violence is the violence of the respectable,
the violence of the powerful that seeks personal gain
and privilege by maintaining inhuman conditions. It
is the violence of the board rooms, legislators and
jurists - the white collar violence that puts surplus
milk down sewers, robs workers of their wages, maintains
prisons of infamy, lies to children, discards the weak
and old, and insist that some should half-live while
others rape and ravage the earth. This latter type of
violence is what we must become aware of and actively
dismantle if the future is to hold any possibilities
for peace and a world where all men and women have a
right to live and develop and participate by reason
of their humanity, not by reason of their class, productive
ability or shrewdness.
Nonviolence
Nonviolence
cannot then be understood as passivity or indifference
to the dynamic of life (i.e., communication between
men). It is not the posture of removing oneself from
conflict that marks the truly nonviolent man, but, quite
on the contrary, it is placing oneself at the heart
of that dynamic. Nonviolence means taking the responsibility
for aiding the direction of human communication and
brotherhood. Nonviolence means an active opposition
to those acts and attitudes that demean and brutalize
another and it means an active support of those values
and expressions that foster human solidarity. Nonviolence,
in essence, means taking a stand in favor of life and
refusing to delegate individual moral responsibility
to another person or group; it means taking control
of one's life and aiding others in doing likewise. Nonviolence
is an attempt to find truth and love even in the midst
of hatred, destruction and pride.
As
the means cannot be separated from the desired ends,
nonviolence cannot be separated from peace, for it is
the value system and dynamic that makes peace possible.
The
Times
The
past has not be given to us; it is not ours to breathe
or exhale. We live with the smallest perimeter, which
we call today, and into this brief moment, into this
small space we beckon and command the future. These
are not good times, but good times do not mold great
people. The sins of our excesses and arrogance can destroy
us, or these failings can humble us to sainthood. Such
are the times. If the great virtues and teachings of
the martyrs, resisters, and saints are relegated to
a utopian or future-oriented condition, then indeed,
they have little value for us at all. But the great
heritage that this "community of liberation"
has left us is not some unreal, impossible dream. It
is this: Love can, and must, be lived today, despite
the pain and difficulty of such life. Tomorrow will
carry the tenderness and peace which we live now. Do
not compromise today. It is all, dear brothers and sisters,
that we have. This assembled community of peacemakers
has paid dearly for their belief in such words and their
lives form a chronicle of inspiration. They have been
demeaned and laughed at; they have been dragged through
jails and courtrooms and prisons; a few have paid the
price of peace with their lives.
The
Themes and People
The
first signs of a violent society appear in its basic
inability to communicate. Words lose their meaning and
become hollow. They are twisted and deformed as tools
of manipulation and servitude. Noble words such as truth,
goodness, and love may come to mean despotism, obedience
and death. Peace becomes another name for multiheaded
war missiles, and nonviolence is wrenched to mean silence,
or lack of opposition, to thievery, privilege and the
status quo.
The
Spiritual
A
line from a contemporary song pleads" "Help
me make it through the night." We find our existence
framed in terms of aloneness rather than solidarity,
struggles rather than consummations; departures rather
than arrivals, questions rather than answers, and most
importantly, night rather than daylight.
We
cry out for fear the night will absorb us, yet we are
unsure of any presence; we sing so as not to be crushed,
yet the tones reflect the endless chant of the nightingales;
we dance so as not to fall prey to these awesome interludes
of emptiness; and most of all we pray so as not to lie.
And these are the words we may use: "Help us make
it through the night." Yet in the aloneness and
struggle, in the departures and questions, in the cries
and songs, in the dances and prayers there are imprints
of heroic men and women, there are weavings of beauty,
there are caresses of God. Traced through the faces
of the old are messages of dignity and tenderness. The
wail of the newborn is proof of silent breaths conspiring
together. Each "forgive me" and "I love
you" is prefaced by the warm tides of grace. Saints
are born in Harlem in precise rhythm. Young people hurdle
concrete mazes to touch and remember. Children weep
for lost birds. Monks and mystics pray the sun up in
the morning and call the evening dew. There are still
wonderment, wishes and dreams.
You
must never forget that you are the brother or the sister
of a carpenter and the child of a king. You must remember
that all life is unfulfilled without you. You must learn
that life is mysterious and sacred and that you must
never, never destroy it. And if you listen well you
will hear the chanting of others, and they are singing
to you: "Help us make it through the night."
Edward
Guinan is a Paulist priest and founder of the Community
for Creative Nonviolence in Washington, D.C.
This
reading is from The Class of Nonviolence ,
prepared by Colman McCarthy of the Center for Teaching
Peace, 4501 Van Ness Street, NW , Washington , D.C.
20016 202/537-1372.
Article found on: http://www.salsa.net/peace/conv/index.html
|