The
Promise of the Guatemalan Elections
By
Kathy Rodriguez
January 14, 2004 was the inauguration of the new president
of Guatemala, Oscar Berger. There seemed to be much enthusiasm
and hope for this new government while we were in Guatemala
on the CAMINOS delegation. A couple of people joked that Berger
was already rich, so there was no need to rob the people -
a reference to the corruption of the previous Portillo government.
Both Frank LaRue and Rigoberta Menchu have accepted positions
in the new administration which may signal some seriousness
regarding human rights and the genocide cases. The following
is an excerpt from an analysis by the Myrna Mack Foundation
of the first few months of the Berger government. It may be
viewed in its entirety at http://nisgua.org/articles/mack_business_analysis.htm
The
new administration of Guatemalan President Oscar Berger has
already been marked by a number of social and labor conflicts
and scandals. These include the revelation of acts of corruption
committed during the previous administration; a political
controversy around the dismissal of the Attorney General of
the Republic and the General Comptroller for the Nation’s
Accounts; and the confirmation that dirty money financed the
electoral campaigns of some of the political parties.
These events have
held the interest of media and public opinion for several
weeks now, but other aspects of the first two months of the
Berger administration have gone unexamined. Very little has
been said, for example, about the fragility and political
insecurity of the new administration, the lack of progress
toward building consensus on a national work agenda, the apparent
inability to reach a political understanding with opposition
parties, or the internal disputes among government groups
that could eventually undermine stability in this new context.
Some street-level
conflicts, like the truck-drivers’ strike, are new and
may have been intentionally stimulated. Other old conflicts
have re-ignited, such as plantation evictions and the ongoing
confrontation between teachers and officials of the education
system. Added to these are the precarious nature of state
finances and political instability in Congress.
Education Minister,
María del Carmen Aceña, has already had to face
protests, marches, and even legal actions against her by teachers
unhappy with the fact that teaching positions included in
the previous administration’s budget are now being reviewed.
The government of former President Alfonso Portillo left this
time bomb intentionally activated by responding to partisan
interests with commitments that would be difficult to meet
given the condition of the Education budget.
Truck drivers took
to the streets in February to protest the municipality’s
decision to keep trucks off the principal city roads during
peak traffic hours. As protests became more intense and violent,
combined forces (National Civilian Police and Army) were ordered
to put down the demonstration. As a result, the government
has already had to use force, and some truck drivers have
been arrested and are currently facing criminal charges of
terrorism.
The lack of coordination
and communication between the municipality of Guatemala City
and the Central Government was evident in these events, as
the personal quarrels between the Mayor and the President,
dating back several years, did not allow the two to work together
to resolve the problem. Furthermore, it is believed that the
protests were sparked with the specific intention of creating
political conflict for the new government . Former Vice-President
Francisco Reyes López, who owns several of the trucking
units involved in the demonstrations, may have participated
actively in this process.
In rural areas,
one problem that has reemerged with force but with little
media coverage has been the eviction of peasant farmers from
large plantations. Evictions had been strategically suspended
during much of the previous administration, but courts suddenly
began to process eviction orders more quickly when the new
government took over. This appears to be another effort to
stimulate conflict on sensitive and explosive issues.
It remains to be seen how much political
will the new government really has for the serious commitment
of re-launching the peace process and what concrete measures
it will take to make substantial progress in the fulfillment
of the Peace Accords. For the time being, the old “Accompaniment
Commission” for the Peace Accords has disappeared and
in its place for the transition period is a Peace Commission
made up of representatives from the academic, pro-justice,
labor, indigenous, and government sectors, among others.
Related
Articles:
Guatemala:
On the Road with Rights Action
|