| Standards
Addressed by Lesson: CIVICS
Standard 3.2
Students understand how the United States develops foreign
policy. (b) Standard 3.3
Students understand the domestic and foreign policy
influence the United States has on other nations and
how the actions of other nations influence politics
and society of the United States . HISTORY Standard
3.1 Students know how various
societies were affected by contacts and exchanges among
diverse peoples. (b) Standard
4.2 Students understand how economic factors have
influenced historical events. (c,d) GEOGRAPHY
Standard 4.5 Students
know how cooperation and conflict among people influence
the division and control of Earth's surface.
Objectives
of Lesson: |
To
give students an overview of Guatemala 's history,
and make them aware of the past and ongoing political,
economic and social struggles.
|
Instructional
Strategies: |
Discussion,
skit, group activity
|
Vocabulary:
|
Colonialism,
underdevelopment, globalization, paramilitaries,
guerrillas, United Fruit Company, peace accords,
civil war, massacre, refugees, indigenous, mestizo
|
Suggested
Time: |
60-90
minutes
|
Suggested
Resources to Obtain: |
-
1 copy of each act of the
Guatemala Skits
-
Scrap paper, crayons
-
2 copies of the “Two Women” poem in Rethinking
Our Classrooms: Teaching for Equity and Social
Justice (Bill Bigelow, Rethinking Schools
Ltd., 1994)
|
|
Attachments:
|
A.
Guatemala Skits
B.
Skit Cheat Sheet for Educator
C.
Guatemala – A Brief History
D.
Guatemala History Notes
|
Lesson
Outline
Icebreaker
/ Quick Activity to Assess Prior Learning:
Ask
students what they know about Guatemala and write comments
on board or a flip chart. Educator and students may
want to refer back to this list as they gain more knowledge.
Introduction
to Lesson:
This
lesson is an overview of Guatemala from the perspective
of Guatemala's recent history and includes some cultural
context and current events. Students are given a brief
overview of Guatemalan history and are then asked to
act out key events (Activities 1 and 2). Students will
be asked to reflect on the skits performed by their
classmates and respond to questions asked by the educator.
The educator should stress the importance of active
participation from each student because it is essential
to the success of the lesson.
Activities
Activity
1:
Guatemala History and Slide Show
The
educator begins by doing a presentation on Guatemalan
history using the Guatemalan History Notes (Attachment
C) as a guide. Allow students to ask questions and inform
them that they will be using this information to perform
skits after the presentation.
Activity
2:
Skits
Divide
students up into five groups to perform skits in front
of the class. Each group should be given a copy of the
skit descriptions (Attachment A) and will perform one
act. Allow the students at least 15 minutes to choose
roles and create a script for the act that they will
be performing. The skit does not have to be more than
2 or 3 minutes. Stress to them that each member of the
group should be involved and suggest that they use props
if they are available or make them with the paper and
crayons you provide. After each act, review the scenario
that was just performed. Prompt the class by asking
them the discussion questions in the Skit Cheat Sheet
for the Educator (Attachment B) and also highlight the
points mentioned. After all the skits have been performed,
continue the discussion with the class and allow them
to ask questions that may have come up during the skits.
Activity
3:
“Two Women” Poem
Ask
for two female volunteers and give them each a copy
of the “Two Women” poem. Ask them to read the alternating
dialogue. When they are finished, ask each how she felt
playing her respective role. Ask other students to respond
to the poem. You can use the following questions to
prompt discussion:
-
What was your first reaction to the roles in the poem?
Did the roles go in the direction that you expected?
-
What situation is described in the two roles? Where
in the world could this have taken place?
-
Do you see yourself in the story? In which character(s)?
In which situation?
-
What do you think
are the resources of social and political ferment that
brought on the situation described? What helps to perpetuate
the problems?
-
How would the rich woman define freedom? How would the
poor woman define freedom?
-
What can we in the
U.S. do to change the situations that set the stage
for violent acts of desperation at home or abroad?
DJPC
2004
Attachment
A: Guatemala Skit
Act
1 - “The Conquest”
In
1524, Spanish explorer Pedro de Alvarado began exploring
the region of Guatemala. The goal of de Alvarado and
his crew was to conquer Guatemala and her people, claim
the country for themselves, and steal her riches to
send back to Spain. What the explorers found when reaching
the shores of Guatemala was an advanced Maya civilization
represented by 25 different ethnic groups each speaking
its own indigenous language.
Mal,
a woman from the Quiché people, was deeply saddened
by how cruel the Spanish were when they arrived. Many
indigenous people were killed and their lands were taken
from them. (Between 75% and 90% of the Maya were killed
by war or disease.) Mal's family, like many others,
was forced to work on the coffee plantations where they
were treated like slaves. Mal and her brothers would
get up before sunrise to go to work in the fields and
did not leave their coffee picking until after dark.
Life was hard and cruel. To keep their spirits up, Mal's
husband Lu would tell the children stories of how grand
the Maya civilization was before the Spaniards came.
Lu told them that the Maya were a very advanced people.
They had developed a calendar, mathematics, astronomy
and architecture before the Spaniards came.
Act
2 - “The Colonial Era”
Guatemala
remained under Spanish rule for more than two centuries.
During this time, the Spanish invaders made a lot of
money selling crops that the native Guatemalan people
were forced to produce to other countries.
After
Guatemala gained its independence from Spain in 1821,
the exportation of agricultural products increased even
more. Huge amounts of coffee were sold to foreign countries,
and soon bananas, cotton, tobacco, cocoa beans, spices,
and cattle were also big exports. Businesses in foreign
countries wanted to profit from this production and
so invested more and more money in Guatemala.
Even
though Guatemala was independent from Spain, this did
not mean that the Guatemalan people were free from suffering.
In many ways the country was still controlled by the
wealthy Spanish colonists who stayed in Guatemala. Many
indigenous people had their land taken away by the Spanish
settlers. With no land and little opportunity, many
Guatemalans had to work on banana, coffee and cotton
plantations under the same awful conditions as before.
Act
3 – “The U.S. Goes Bananas”
(Remember,
from Act 1, that indigenous people had their land stolen
from them by the Spanish and were forced to work like
slaves on the plantations)
By
the early 1900's, more foreign companies began investing
in Guatemala. These companies tried to create friendships
with Guatemala's ruling class of landowners and with
the Guatemalan government. John Foster Dulles and his
brother, Allen, were both part of the U.S. government
and had control over the United Fruit Company, a banana
grower in Guatemala. This company was owned by U.S.
businessmen, but it owned more land in Guatemala than
anyone else! U.S. businessmen also owned Guatemala's
railway company AND Guatemala's electrical facilities.
Much of the country's economy was controlled by U.S.
interests.
Workers
on the banana plantations were treated badly. They were
yelled at, they could not take breaks, and they were
paid very, very little. They worked long, hard hours
under the hot sun, and were frightened and abused.
Jorge
Ubico was the president of Guatemala from 1931-1944.
He had a good relationship with the U.S. – especially
since the U.S. helped him win the presidency. Ubico
offered substantial help to foreign companies a lot:
he made sure they had the best land, he did not charge
them much in taxes, and he did not enforce laws to protect
workers. Ubico's presidency was a fearful time for many
Guatemalans—much of the population lived in poverty
and had no land. The government was repressive, especially
toward labor, executing some labor leaders who caused
too much trouble for the government's friends, such
as the banana company.
Act
4 – “The Revolutionary Years”
When
the poverty, suffering, and abuse by the government
became too much, the people demanded justice. Workers
went out on strike, and students and other citizens
protested demanding government change.
In
1951, Jacobo Arbenz became president. (His presidency
and that of his predecessor, Juan Jos é
Ar é
valo, were
known as the “10 Years of Spring.”). The changes he
put into place were an attempt to confront the two main
power holders in Guatemala: large landholders and foreign
companies. He passed laws to help the poor in Guatemala.
He wanted the owners of the United Fruit Company (From
Act 3: This is the banana grower, owned by U.S. interests,
that controlled most of Guatemala's land.) and
other foreign companies to pay taxes to the Guatemalan
government, pay workers the legal wage and, most of
all, let workers join unions if they wanted to.
Arbenz
also passed a law to help Guatemalans without land.
(From Act 1: Indigenous people's land was stolen
from them by the Spaniards who forced them to work like
slaves on the coffee plantations.) This law meant
landowners like the United Fruit Company that had huge
farms had to sell part of their land to the government.
The government redistributed this land to approximately
100,000 families who did not have land to live and grow
food on.
Act
5 – “The End of Guatemala's 10 Years of Spring
and
the Beginning of War”
(From
Acts 3 and 4: The United Fruit Company, a U.S. owned
banana plantation, owns most of the land in Guatemala.
President Jacobo Arbenz wants to help Guatemala's poor
and landless. He passes laws to make large landowners
like the United Fruit Company sell some of its land
to the Guatemalan government AND respect workers.)
John
Foster Dulles, his brother Allen (members of the U.S.
government and part owners of the United Fruit Company)
and the U.S. government felt threatened by Jacobo Arbenz.
They did not like that the new government was taking
away U.S. land and forcing the United Fruit Company
to respect workers and pay taxes. Their power over Guatemala
was being taken away. Wealthy Guatemalan landowners
were also angered by the changes Arbenz made.
The
CIA began training Guatemalans who opposed Arbenz so
that they could overthrow his government. They trained
in Honduras for almost a year. In 1954, the trained
forces, along with the CIA planes flown by U.S. pilots,
bombed Guatemala City. After the invasion, a U.S. Embassy
plane brought the new Guatemalan President Castillo
Armas to the capital and Arbenz fled the country.
Castillo
Armas took the land away from poor Guatemalans and gave
it back to the rich landowners. Foreign companies were
no longer forced to pay their workers fair wages or
allow them to form unions.
Act
6 – “Rebuilding Lives”
At
the end of Guatemala's 36-year long civil war, many
refugees who had been in Mexico began returning to Guatemala.
Juan
was one of these refugees. In 1983, when he was six
years old, Juan witnessed his mother, grandparents,
sisters and brothers being killed by soldiers. That
day, 14 others from his village were also murdered.
Juan fled to Mexico with his father and uncle. They
settled in a refugee camp just across the border from
Guatemala. When the Peace Accords were signed in 1996,
Juan's family decided to return to live in the village
of Santa Maria.
They
have been resettled now for almost seven years, but
life is still hard. The land that they have is not enough
to support the family. There are no doctors in the village,
only a clinic run by a few people who have a little
healthcare training. There is an elementary school,
but no middle school or high school. If kids want to
study in a middle school, their parents have to have
enough money to send them to the neighboring town of
Cantabal. Juan is a teacher at the school in the village
but the government does not pay his salary every month.
Up until now, he has felt lucky to have this job because
he can stay in the village with his wife, Cecilia, and
their two children, Maria and José. Some of his
friends have had to take their whole family south to
work on coffee plantations for part of the year. It
is very hard work, the owners do not pay well, and the
children cannot go to school.
Lately,
Juan has been thinking about trying to go ‘North.' He
heard that in the United States there is much work,
and they pay you well. He would be sad to leave his
family but if the government doesn't pay his wages soon,
he does not know what other options he might have. His
friends, Manuel and Ricardo, left the village last year
to go to the United States and are sending money home
to their families.
Attachment
B: Skit Cheat Sheet for Educator
Act
1 – “The Conquest”
FOLLOW
UP QUESTIONS:
Have
students describe what is happening in this act.
Who
has the power?
Is
it the Guatemalans or external powers or governments?
How
were the indigenous people treated? What happened to
their land?
POINTS
TO HIGHLIGHT :
There were patterns set up during the conquest that
impacted the recent civil war as well as present day
Guatemala:
Indigenous people
had their lands taken from them pushing them deep into
poverty. (Land was used not only to live on but also
to grow food.)
The indigenous were
forced to work on coffee plantations.
Racism was instilled
into the society.
Resources flowed
out of Guatemala to the Spanish.
Act
2 - “The Colonial Era”
FOLLOW
UP QUESTIONS:
Have
students describe what is happening in this act.
What
were the dynamics between the Spanish and the indigenous
before independence?
How
did they change after independence?
What
options were available to the indigenous?
Act
3 – “The U.S. Goes Bananas”
FOLLOW
UP QUESTIONS:
Have
students describe what is happening in this act.
How
are workers treated?
Whose
interests did the Guatemalan government represent?
Act
4 – “The Revolutionary Years”
What
changes took place during these years?
Who
stood to benefit and lose from these changes?
Why
would this period be described as the “10 Years of Spring”?
Act
5 – “The End of Guatemala's 10 Years of Spring
and
the Beginning of War”
FOLLOW
UP QUESTIONS:
Have
students describe what is happening in this act.
What
changes took place when Armas came to power?
Who
benefited, who lost?
Why
did the U.S. get involved?
Act
6 – “Rebuilding Lives”
FOLLOW
UP QUESTIONS:
Have
students describe what is happening in this act.
What
are some of the challenges that Guatemalans face today?
What
institutions in society (e.g. schools, hospitals, etc.)
are required to ensure that all citizens
have
equal opportunities to succeed personally and collectively?
Who should guarantee
their
accessibility?
Attachment
C: Guatemala – A Brief History
The
Mayan civilization flourished throughout much
of Guatemala and the surrounding region long before
the Spanish arrived, but it was already in decline
when the Mayans were defeated by Pedro de Alvarado
in 1523-24. During Spanish colonial rule, most
of Central America came under the control of the
Captaincy General of Guatemala.
Guatemala
gained independence from Spain on September 15,
1821; it briefly became part of the Mexican Empire
and then for a period belonged to a federation
called the United Provinces of Central America.
From the mid-19th century until the mid-1980s,
the country passed through a series of dictatorships,
insurgencies (particularly beginning in the 1960s),
coups, and stretches of military rule with only
occasional periods of representative government.
From
1944-1954, Guatemalan society enjoyed what is
now referred to as the "Ten Years of Spring"
with two popularly elected and reformist Presidents.
President Arbenz, himself a former military officer,
permitted free expression, legalized unions and
diverse political parties, and initiated basic
socio-economic reforms. One key program was a
moderate land reform effort aimed at alleviating
the suffering of the rural poor. Pursuant to this
plan, only plantations of very high acreage were
affected; and only in cases where a certain percentage
of such acreage was in fact lying unused. In these
extreme cases, the unused portions of the land
were not expropriated, but simply purchased by
the Guatemalan government at the same value declared
on the owner's tax forms. The property was then
resold at low rates to peasant cooperatives. To
set an example, President Arbenz started with
his own lands.
Unfortunately
for the people of Guatemala, the United Fruit
Company was, at that time, one of the largest
landowners in the country. Moreover, the "Frutera"
had greatly undervalued the value of its holdings
on its tax returns to the Guatemalan government.
The executives were thus highly displeased when
their fallow lands were forcibly bought back by
the government at the price they themselves had
declared. In 1954, at the height of the McCarthy
era, the Company leaders hurried to Washington
and cried "Communism." The results were
swift and predictable. The CIA promptly organized
a group of Guatemalan military dissidents, trained,
armed and funded them, and helped them to plan
and carry out a violent coup d'etat
against the legally and popularly elected Arbenz.
Arbenz himself was driven out of Guatemala and
died heartbroken in exile. A blood bath ensued,
peasant cooperatives were destroyed, unions and
political parties crushed, and dissidents hunted
down. Thousands were killed and many more fled
the country. Recently released CIA documents include
a CIA hit list prepared before the coup, identifying
political and intellectual leaders as military
targets. A military dictatorship was installed
in the presidency and remained there until the
1986 election of civilian President Venizio Cerezo.
A horrified young physician known as Che fled
the country with the others, and moved to Cuba
to help Fidel fight what he had seen for himself
of "Yankee Imperialism."
Although
the "Ten Years of Spring" attempt lay
in ruins, the experience had whetted the popular
appetite for reforms. Church leaders began to
lead landless peasants to the swamplands of the
Ixcan, helping them to establish cooperative villages
and start a new life. Rural literacy campaigns
flourished, and health promoter teams set to work
in the aldeas . Cautious efforts to unionize
in the cities began anew, and social commentary
and criticism emanated from the University circles.
A Mayan civil rights movement began, with demands
for equality and an end to the repression. Simultaneously,
a fledgling armed resistance movement laid roots
in countryside. The FAR organized in the northeastern
jungles of the Peten, while the EGP and ORPA organized
in the western Mayan regions. All three groups
later merged with the PGT of the capital, forming
a united front called the U.R.N.G. in 1981.
By
the late 1970s, the powers that be were alarmed
by the growing popular demands for reforms. As
had happened so many times in the past, they responded
with great cruelty and force. The Guatemalan military
set about to wipe out all such "subversive"
activities for once and for all. Father William
Woods, a U.S. citizen and a Maryknoll priest who
had led the cooperative movement in the Ixcan
region, received numerous death threats.
In
1978 he was flying his small plane out of the
region with three other Americans on board, including
a young volunteer, a physician, and a journalist
for a Church publication. The plane was shot down
and all four were killed. In 1981 small group
of Mayan leaders marched to the capital and peacefully
occupied the Spanish Embassy to protest the repression
against their people. Despite the calls of the
Spanish Ambassador to leave them in peace, the
authorities burned the building to the ground,
killing all of the protesters as well as all of
the Embassy staff. The Ambassador, badly injured,
was the only survivor.
These
horrifying events have become symbolic of the
wave of repression carried out by the Guatemalan
military against the civilian population throughout
the l980s. Often referred to as the "Silent
Holocaust", the campaign left 200,000 civilians
dead at the hands of the military death squads,
and 440 Mayan villages wiped from the map. Extreme
torture became commonplace as a method of coercion
and intimidation. The union movement in the capital
was crushed, and the literacy and rural health
movements were destroyed as well. Repression against
leaders of the Catholic Church was so intense
that nuns and priests were finally evacuated from
the Mayan highlands, their abandoned Churches
used as barracks and often torture centers by
the military. Thousands of catechistas
were "disappeared". Hundreds of thousands
of Guatemalans either fled the country or fled
inwards into the jungles, forming the CPRs, or
civilian resistance populations. Many others chose
to pick up weapons and leave for the mountains
to join the U.R.N.G. forces.
The
United States role throughout this time period
was hardly illustrious. Despite the extreme and
obvious repression, the U.S. continued to send
massive military aid throughout most of the war.
Even when such aid was temporarily suspended,
arms and equipment supplies continued. The School
of the Americas continued to train and graduate
Guatemalan officers who became notorious for their
human rights violations. Training manuals used
clearly indicate practices which would violate
human rights. Meanwhile, CIA officials worked
closely with Guatemalan intelligence officers
linked to death squad activities. Many such officers
were on CIA payroll as "assets" or paid
informants, despite their well known record for
serious human right violations. The CIA, moreover,
knowingly paid "assets" for information
obtained through the use of kidnapping, torture
and extrajudicial execution. Worse yet, it was
not unusual for North Americans to enter areas
where prisoners were being secretly detained and
tortured, ask some questions, then leave the victims
to their fates. The Red Cross, United Nations,
police and family members were never notified.
The
civil war continued for more than thirty five
years, the final peace accords being signed in
December 1996. The United Nations sponsored Truth
Commission, or Commission for Historical Clarification,
("CEH"), presented its findings in March
1999. The Commission found that the Guatemalan
army had committed some 93% of the total war crimes,
and had carried out over 600 massacres. Moreover,
the army's counterinsurgency campaign had legally
constituted genocide against the Mayan people.
The U.R.N.G. forces were charged with 3% of the
violations.
A
key finding of the report was the conclusion that
the United States government had directly contributed
to this thirty year genocidal campaign. This included
not only the 1954 CIA coup against President Arbenz,
but also included the training of known human
rights violators at the School of the Americas
and other military centers, the continued financing
of such human rights violators, and the close
collaboration with military intelligence units
which carried out death squad activities. |
http://www.globalexchange.org/countries/guatemala/history.html
http://www.ncbuy.com/reference/country/backgrounds.html?code=gt&sec=backhistory
Attachment
D: Guatemala History Notes
Maya
Civilization
Earliest
Mayan culture dates back to the Formative Period of
Mesoamerican civilizations from 300 BC to 100 AD, but
it did not reach its peak until the Classic Period (200-925
AD).
In
600 AD, as Teotihuacán (of the Toltecs of Central
Mexico) was in decline, Maya civilization was making
cultural advances never before seen on this continent;
especially in the fields of astronomy, architecture,
mathematics, and the calendar.
Around
790 AD, they began to mysteriously decline. Village
after village was abandoned until the end of the 9 th
century, when the civilization disappeared entirely.
Why? Different theories include: a population explosion
placed unsustainable demands on resources; a misuse
of land; or invasions from northern groups.
From
900 AD until the Spanish invasion, there was an almost
total decline. But, this period saw the onset of class
systems (priests, merchants, and serfs), government
regulation and taxation.
The
Conquest
In
1524, Pedro de Alvarado began exploring the region of
Guatemala. He led an expedition against the Quiché
people, who were at that point the most powerful and
wealthy ethnic group in the region.
When
the Spaniards arrived, they by no means encountered
a primitive society. Although the height of the Maya
Civilization had long vanished, it was still a complex
society-in-transition, with multiple social tensions
to be manipulated in Spain's favor.
Similar
to what happened in Mexico, Alvarado was able to manipulate
feuds between indigenous groups to defeat them. He conquered
the indigenous peoples and went about setting up his
colonial empire and converting the indigenous to Catholicism.
Guatemala
was not near as rich in gold as Mexico, so it was somewhat
of a disappointment in that aspect. The Spanish made
up for it by using forced indigenous labor to establish
large coffee plantations. After the conquest, between
75% and 90% of the Mayan population was killed by war
and European diseases.
Colonial
Period
In
1821, Guatemala (with the rest of Central America) gained
independence from Spain, but Guatemalan conservatives
decided they would rather be “the tail of a lion than
the head of a mouse,” and joined the Mexican empire.
It did not last and, in 1823, they formed the Federation
of Central American States. By 1847, the Federation
was totally dissolved, and Guatemala's political borders
looked pretty much as they do today.
The
colonial period in Guatemala brought with it all the
same seeds of inequality, exploitation, and “underdevelopment”
as it did everywhere else in Latin America. Economic,
social, and political priorities were determined by
the interests of the ruling class in Spain. Production
was based on Spanish, not Guatemalan needs, and was
subject (as it is today) to market fluctuations, etc.
Indigenous
communities had to pay tributes, and land (the primary
source of wealth) was expropriated from them by the
Spanish settlers. The hacienda system ( latifundia-minifundia
) was created, and it was a mono-export economy
(coffee). They exploited the indigenous workforce through
coercion and terror to ensure the “smooth” functioning
of the economic system.
The
Catholic Church, a huge landholder, functioned as part
of the repressive state apparatus and provided, with
its skewed interpretation of the Beatitudes, the ideological
underpinning for the pacification of the indigenous
population.
Indigenous
resistance manifested itself in numerous uprisings quashed
by military force. The rape of indigenous women led
to the racial intermixing and the ladino population.
The
colonial period was marked by power struggles between
“Liberals” and “Conservatives.”
The
importance of coffee led to the greater concentration
of land because coffee requires large tracts of land.
It also required more infrastructure and other state
support of private enterprise. The police state enforced
mandatory labor and seasonal migration to the coast
for harvests. (Vagrancy laws made it illegal for people
to be in one place too long, sanctioning police actions.)
The
Onset of Economic Globalization
By
the first half of the 20 th century, enormous increases
in global trade brought even more foreign investment
to Guatemala, with the foreign firms of the imperialist
powers seeking alliances with Guatemalan elite.
United Fruit
Company (UFCO)
–the largest land-holder in all of Guatemala, a monopoly
in banana production. Its subsidiary, International
Railways of Central America (IRCA ), the company's
railway, monopolized transport facilities. Electric
Bond and Share completely controlled Guatemala's
electrical facilities.
Until the 1944 October
Revolution, these 3 companies enjoyed unchallenged privileges,
including tax exemptions, the best land, government-financed
infrastructure made exclusively for them, and non-regulation
of their activities. The first half of the 1900's saw
increasing ties between U.S. political and economic
interests and the Guatemalan oligarchy.
1931-1944 – All
these arrangements culminated in the dictatorship of
Jorge Ubico, who came to power with U.S. support. U.S.
maneuvering helped to secure his elections against “undesirable”
(or “nationalistic”) candidates. (His 1936 re-election
“coincided” with renewed contracts and new privileges
for both UFCO and IRCA.)
Under this “liberalism,”
the strong state was consolidated to protect investment
rather than citizens. However, the stock market crash
of 1929 and the resultant global recession deeply affected
world coffee prices, which had a devastating affect
on the Guatemalan economy.
Also, World War
II effectively closed Guatemala off from the European
market, increasing its dependence on the U.S., which
was allowed set prices almost unilaterally, resulting
in a significant loss of export earnings for Guatemala.
Under Ubico, unemployment
increased, smaller producers lost property, and the
state reduced expenditures.
While other Latin
America countries (like Mexico) experimented with ISI
( Import Substitution Industrialization) during this
time, Ubico attempted to reinforce the status quo
in Guatemala, implementing repressive labor legislation,
executions of labor and oppositions leaders, etc.
The
Revolution
The
exacerbation of poverty and repression under Ubico spurred
discontent among the petty bourgeoisie – mostly middle-class
university students, intellectuals, small businessmen,
and junior army officers.
Discontent
manifested itself in strikes and protests that led to
the October 20, 1944 revolution that overthrew Ubico.
Elections were held in 1944, and Juan José Arévalo
was elected president.
From
March 1945 – March 1951, Arévalo served as president.
He instituted moderate reforms that paved the way for
deeper changes later.
Universal suffrage
was granted to all adults except illiterate women (which
in those days was, of course, most women);
Basic freedoms were
guaranteed;
Political parties
were allowed to function freely (except the Communist
party – Arévalo was clearly anti-Communist and
fairly supportive of international capital.);
One-third of state
expenditures went to social spending;
Labor legislation
to protect workers was enacted; and
Labor organizing
began in UFCO and IRCA!
In
1951, Jacobo Arbenz succeeded Arévalo as President
and had the support of organized labor, the revolutionary
parties, and the communists. Arbenz was committed to
breaking Guatemala's economic dependence, meaning he
had to confront two main power holders left untouched
by Arévalo—foreign monopolies and the land oligarchy.
Arbenz
had not initially planned on nationalizing foreign firms,
but rather on enforcing the new labor and tax legislation,
and competing with the private firms on government projects
to challenge their monopolies. When UFCO responded,
however, by firing large numbers of workers who demanded
compliance with labor laws, Arbenz confiscated 26,000
acres of land from UFCO as a guarantee for payment of
back wages. But all of this would be overshadowed by
what was about to happen in response to Arbenz's 1952
Agrarian Reform Law.
Expropriations
began in 1953, and by June 1954, approximately 100,000
peasant families had received land and rural social
services had increased. Big land owners were infuriated,
and retaliated against the peasants. In turn, the peasants
reacted by occupying land and sometimes they, too, reacted
with violence. The Agrarian Reform polarized the entire
country as either pro- or anti-revolution.
At
this time, UFCO was the largest land-holder. However,
of its 550,000+ acres, less than 15% was under cultivation.
The government expropriated 400,000 acres (much of it
unused) and offered it as compensation at the seriously
undervalued amount that UFCO had used to value its land
for tax (evasion) purposes. Meanwhile, the U.S. was
becoming aggravated because the Guatemala government
refused to “modify” the labor codes that “discriminated”
against UFCO and the protectionist oil laws that closed
the door to foreign oil investment. The U.S. press denounced
the Arbenz administration as communist. Arbenz refused
to conform to World Bank recommendations, which alienated
Guatemala from international credit sources.
The
Coups
By
early 1954, powerful, conservative sectors of Guatemala
society had mobilized. Meanwhile, the CIA was training
Guatemalan counter-revolutionary forces on UFCO plantations
in Honduras and Nicaragua. The U.S.' role was further
compromised by the fact that John Foster Dulles, the
Secretary of State, had been a partner in UFCO's law
firm. His brother, Allen, the CIA Director, had served
on UFCO's Board of Directors. While certainly a product
of U.S. interventionism, there was a lot of division
in Guatemala and support for the counter-revolution.
Sensing
U.S. maneuvering and manipulation of hemispheric and
global politics, Arbenz called a state of siege, but
it was too late. In June, the invasion from Honduras,
backed by CIA aerial support (CIA planes flown by U.S.
pilots), began a regular bombing of Guatemala City and
other cities to undermine the Arbenz government. On
July 8, 1954, the CIA-chosen Col. Castillo Armas was
flown to Guatemala City in a U.S. Embassy plane and
became President. The U.S. justification for this action
was “to make the world safe for democracy” (i.e. investment)
and “to destroy the Communist menace.”
Era
of Political, Economic, and Social Repression and La
Violencia
A
witch hunt ensued to eliminate all progressives through
torture, disappearances, and killing. The new government
completely repealed all nationalist, protective legislation
and opened up Guatemala to oil exploration by foreign
firms.
Export-led
growth became more entrenched as Guatemala's answer
to its economic woes. They diversified agriculture through
investment in sugar, cotton, and cattle, in addition
to coffee. At the same time, the country began to import
basic grains for internal consumption. Industrialization
increased, mainly through foreign investment, thereby
increasing the domination of foreign capital in determining
the rules of the country.
The
1980s were characterized by economic shocks and sharp
declines in world prices for Guatemala's export agricultural
goods, with a simultaneous rise in oil prices (resulting
in increased prices for rural Guatemalans). The trade
deficit increase was financed by the accumulation of
foreign debt. There was also a huge fiscal deficit because
of Guatemala's seriously skewed tax structure—the most
unequal in all of Latin America.
The
country was also affected by the ravages of so many
years of war—massive displacement of the populations
and food shortages because of crop destruction by the
army. This was made worse by neoliberal economic policy
prescriptions advocated by the U.S. and the International
Monetary Fund (IMF) through wage restraints, social
spending cuts, privatizations, and policies favoring
foreign investment, especially in the maquila sector.
There was a macro-economic “growth” on one hand, but
accompanied on the other hand by extreme deprivation
and poverty. Society was even more polarized as a result.
As
the counter-insurgency war continued, the military was
the spinal column of the ruling coalition, made up of
alliances between the state, the armed forces, and the
landed elite.
In
the 1970s, the guerilla movement began to incorporate
the highlands indigenous population into their ranks.
As a result, in the early years of the 1980s, the rural
indigenous regions suffered enormously from the worst
period of violence—the “scorched earth” campaign waged
by dictator Rios Montt. It was a time of genocide:
- Destruction
of 440 villages
- Killing
of 100,000+ civilians
- 10-12%
of the country's population (or 1 million people)
displaced
- 150,000
fled to Mexico
- Internally
displaced often forced into army controlled villages
- Razing
of forests and crops to deny coverage and food to
the guerillas
- Destruction
of indigenous economic autonomy making that population
available for migrant work on the south coast
This
escalated war effort sucked up more of the state's resources
making even less money available for social spending.
The
resurgence of the guerilla forces occurred as a result
of massive expulsions of peasants from their land and
their exploitation as migrant workers. Their consciousness
was raised by their subjugation making them a labor
force with nothing to lose.
The
guerilla movement of the 1960s had been in the east
and virtually ignored the needs of the indigenous population.
By the late 1970s and early 1980s, the guerilla movement
embraced the ethnic-national question and began to develop
a broad social base. They had the support of the Liberation
Theologians of the Catholic Church (“the Church of the
Poor”). The Church also was split into radical and conservative
components.
In
1982, the four guerilla forces united into the URNG
( Unidad Revolucionaria Nacional Guatemalteca ),
a significant achievement. But under the army holocaust
of the indigenous population, the insurgents were critically
weakened and did not regain strength again until the
late 1980s.
Gen.
Rios Montt was overthrown in 1983, and there was a return
to rule by the army high command. 1983-1985 marked the
emergence of the PACs (paramilitary units), designed
to pit indigenous villagers against indigenous villagers
in order to eradicate the guerilla movement. The PACs
carried out massacres of their own villagers. Participation
in the PACs was forced, not voluntary, and involved
brutal indoctrination and even torture.
When
the army would destroy crops and livelihoods of the
peasants, it would then offer them social work services
and food as a way to win them over (“beans and bullets”).
Peasants were often relocated to “model villages,” where
the army could exercise better control over them.
A
Changing Tide?
With
the presidency of “civilian” Vinicio Cerezo from 1986-1990,
there was a supposed return to civilian power and democracy.
But the change was only cosmetic, not substantive, in
nature. Its purpose was to achieve some semblance of
legitimacy in the international community, which by
this time had cut off most direct aid to Guatemala.
It was also meant to reactivate confidence in the private
sector and stimulate much needed investment after earlier
capital flight during la Violencia . i.e.,
There was no real transfer of power from the military
to civilian authorities.
Meanwhile,
the inequality of resource and income distribution grew,
with untold wealth amidst a landscape of grinding poverty.
The URNG presented Cerezo with its minimum requirements
for a democratic solution to the conflict. The government
responded by escalating military offensives and said
it would not negotiate until the URNG laid down its
arms. Peace negotiations between the government and
the URNG finally began in 1987 and continued sporadically
until 1994 when the parties agreed to an agenda to guide
subsequent talks. The final accord was signed in December
1996. Refugees began to return in organized groups in
the early 1990s.
The
Peace Accords mandated many things:
- Redefined
the military role to be one of external defense rather
than internal security, and mandated its reduction
by 1/3 in both numbers and budget;
- Mandated
the creation of the CEH Truth Commission;
- Authorized
an increase in tax collection to pay for the implementation
of accords;
- Called
for market-based “land reform”;
- Directed
respect for Indigenous Rights and Culture, i.e. indigenous
justice systems, bilingual education, official recognition
of language groups, respect for sacred sites, etc.
Many
of the changes called for in the Peace Accords, especially
in the Accord on Indigenous Rights and Culture, required
constitutional changes through a Constitutional Referendum.
But the Referendum failed for many reasons, namely a
defamation campaign by the wealthy powerful sector and
by awkward, complex wording of the questions for an
illiterate population, a lack of education about the
issues at stake, etc.
Developed
by Catherine Raveczky
Source:
The Battle for Guatemala: Rebels, Death Squads,
and U.S. Power (Susanne Jonas, Westview Press,
1991)
|