| Standards
Addressed by Lesson: CIVICS
Standard 3.3
Students understand the domestic and foreign policy
influence the United States has on other nations and
how the actions of other nations influence politics
and society of the United States . ECONOMICS
Standard 2.3 Students understand that
government actions and policies, including taxes, spending,
and regulations influence the operation of economies.
(d) Standard 3.1 Students understand that the
exchange of goods and services creates economic interdependence
and change (a – d).
(a,e)
HISTORY Standard 4.2 Students
understand how economic factors have influenced historical
events. (d,e) Standard 4.3 Students understand
the historical development and know the characteristics
of various economic systems (b,c,d).
Objectives
of Lesson: |
To
introduce the concept of free trade by making
students familiar with trade restrictions along
with trade agreements.
|
Instructional
Strategies: |
Discussion,
skit, group activity, film
|
Vocabulary:
|
Students
should have a basic understanding of neoliberalism
and its components, one of which is free trade.
This lesson should be preceded by the neoliberalism
workshop.
|
Vocabulary:
|
Free
Trade, North American Free
Trade Agreement (NAFTA), tariffs, quotas, subsidies
|
Suggested
Time: |
50-60
minutes
|
Materials
Needed: |
-
Newsprint, markers
-
Film: Trade Secrets:
The Hidden Costs of the FTAA (Progressive
Films)
-
Props (props that symbolize corn, flags, tariffs,
quotas, environmental / labor legislation, GAP,
subsidies)
-
Copies of “NAFTA's Vicious Cycle” (see Activity
2 for website)
|
Attachments:
|
A.
10 -minute Globalization
Activity
|
Lesson
Outline
Introduction
to Lesson:
This
workshop focuses on the concept of free trade. If students
have prior background on global economics and free trade
from previous classes, allow them to speak about what
they already know to assess the level of understanding
of the class. Express to them that their participation
is a necessary ingredient for the success of the lesson.
Remind them that they should feel free to ask questions
and make comments at anytime.
Icebreaker
/ Quick Activity to Assess Prior Learning:
Make
sure students are familiar with the concepts of globalization
and neoliberalism prior to the workshop. If not, a 10-minute
activity on globalization (see Attachment A) can be
done with the free trade props. Also, the activity can
be used as a refresher for classes that already have
prior knowledge of the concept.
Activities
Activity
1:
Defining Free Trade
What
do people know about free trade? Have you heard anything
about free trade in the news? If so, from which country's
perspective is the news presented? Have the definition
written on newsprint and read it to the class.
Definition
: Free Trade is the gradual
elimination of trade barriers such as import tariffs
and quotas along with other government restrictions.
This elimination allows goods and capital to flow freely
across borders. (Note: Free trade does not
allow for the free movement of labor across borders.)
To
elicit discussion and create a greater understanding
of free trade, students will participate in activity
that looks at free trade in a basic form.
Ask
for three volunteers, to represent Guatemala , Mexico
, and the U.S. Hand out Mexican, Guatemalan, and U.S.
flags to the volunteers. Explain that as a country,
each will decide what products, agricultural or other,
will be produced. (Hand out the corn to all three countries
as this will be a product used as an example.) Each
can also decide whether or not they are going to sell
(export) their products to other countries and how much
they are going to charge other countries for selling
their goods to their citizens (import tax, hold up the
prop) and the amount of goods they are going to accept
from another country (quotas, hold up the prop). They
can also decide how much support (subsidies, hold up
the props) they are going to give to farmers.
Using
the props and the example of corn, define for the students,
tariff, quota and subsidies.
Tariffs
For
example, the U.S. sells corn to Mexico but Mexico charges
a tax for giving the U.S. access to its market. This
import tax is called a tariff .
(Give
the U.S. the tariff prop). This inhibits trade or makes
it harder to trade because it restricts how much corn
the U.S. is willing to sell to Mexico due to the costs.
Mexico wants to impose tariffs to protect its own farmers.
Quotas
Another
restriction on trade is a quota . Mexico
restricts the amount of corn the U.S. can export, say
only 300 lbs a month. (Give the U.S. the quota prop.)
This is another means of protecting Mexican farmers.
Government
Regulation
Other
restrictions to trade are rules that
affect a company's decision to invest in a country.
For example, a country like Mexico may have certain
labor and environmental legislation
that must be followed by a company like the GAP that
wants to open up a factory in Mexico . (Hold up the
GAP prop).
(Give
Mexico the following props as you talk about them)
Ask
the class, “What do I mean by labor legislation or labor
laws?”
Livable
wage
Respecting
the right to organize a union
Minimum
number of hours needed to work a week
Environmental
laws to protect workers' health
All
of these rules may make it more expensive
for the GAP to open up a factory in Mexico . So if Mexico
lifts these restrictions, the GAP
might be more likely to open up a factory there. However,
if you don't eliminate these barriers ,
the GAP might go to Guatemala , China or any other country
where it would be cheaper for them to invest because
these governments are more willing to reduce labor and
environmental standards.
Subsidies
Another
component of the economy that may change due to free
trade are subsidies. Subsidies
are basically support the government gives
to certain sectors of the economy. For example, farmers
often receive money from the government to pay for damaged
crops, to buy seeds, or in the form of loans. (Give
the subsidies to the farmers.)
Ask
the group, “What would a neoliberalist say about the
government giving farmers this money?” A free trader
or a neoliberal economist would say there should be
less government involvement in the economy therefore
farmers should not be receiving these resources.
Free
trade would encourage the countries to get rid of the
restrictions to trade. (Walk over and take quotas
and tariffs and subsidies
and labor and environmental regulations
away from students.) Now it will be much easier
for goods to flow into Mexico and vice versa, and it
will be easier for factories to move to Mexico now that
there aren't any barriers to trade.
This is the basic premise of free trade. (The flow of
corn into Mexico from the U.S. further enhanced by the
subsidies U.S. farmers receive.)
There
are many free trade agreements currently in place or
being negotiated in the Americas . Put up on newsprint:
NAFTA
(North American Free Trade Agreement) – Between
Canada , Mexico , the U.S. Went into place in 1994 to
be completed (i.e. all tariffs eliminated) by 2008,
although many have been terminated earlier than scheduled.
CAFTA
(Central American Free
Trade Agreement) – Between Central American countries
and the U.S. ) Began negotiating in October 2002, signed
in December 2003; sent to all governments for ratification
in 2004. Because of civil society's resistance to the
agreement, ratification has been delayed. The U.S. Congress
is supposed to vote on the agreement in February 2005.
FTAA
(Free Trade Area of the
Americas ) – Scheduled to be finalized by 2005 and to
include all countries but Cuba ; its ratification has
been delayed and is contingent upon CAFTA being approved.
Activity
2:
Video
Let
the students know that they will be watching a video
about NAFTA and the FTAA, entitled, Trade Secrets:
Hidden Costs of the FTAA. Follow up the video with
a brainstorm on positives and negatives about free trade
in Mexico . (Video developed by the Center for Labor
Research and Education at the University of California
– Berkeley . See http://henningcenter.berkeley.edu/projects/tradesecrets.html
for additional information.)
Some
things to point out during the brainstorm :
Positives
Increased
employment for Mexico in factories from 500,000 in 1994
to 1,200,000 in 2001
Increased
exports to the U.S. from 50 billion in 1994 to 135 billion
in 2000
Increased
foreign investment from 4.4 billion in 1993 to 11.8
billion in 1999
NAFTA
has created a lot of growth for the economy and has
increased import earnings and foreign investment. However,
increasing the size of the economic pie does not necessarily
mean that everyone gets a bigger slice. Since there
is a decrease in the role and power of the state, it
is less capable of dispensing economic earnings more
equitably. Instead those who are rich get richer and
the poor get poorer.
Negatives
Salaries
have decreased in Mexico between 18 – 21%.
Subsidies
to farmers have decreased.
U.S.
now sells 6 million tons of corn
as opposed to 1 million.
To
conclude the exercise, you may want to make a copy of
the handout, “NAFTA's Vicious Cycle,” for the students
so they can see how everyone is affected by free trade
agreements such as NAFTA. Available at: www.ips-dc.org/global_econ/rethinking_nafta_oct_2004.pdf
.
Activity
3:
Group Poster Activity
Break
up into groups of 5 and give each group a large piece
of newsprint. Explain that they are going to make a
poster about free trade incorporating some of the concepts
we've been talking about as well as what they saw in
the video.
In
the middle of the newsprint they should draw something
that symbolizes free trade, around this symbol draw
something that symbolizes the policies we've talked
about that impact free trade, and finally around these
policies draw something that symbolizes the human impact
of these policies.
Allow
15 minutes to create the posters then have each group
go around and share.
DJPC
2004
Attachment
A: 10-minute Globalization Activity
I'd
like to start out with a brainstorm on the concept of
globalization . What does it mean to you when
you hear that word?
After
the brainstorm provide students with a definition:
A
global economy is a shift from a world economy that
was made up of
national
economies quite varied in their regulatory and redistributive
principles
to
a global market economy governed by a uniformed set
of rules not all established by governments .
Ask
students if this makes sense? This is a dictionary definition
and I'd like for us to make sense out of this as a group
by breaking up the definition and using some props to
help us understand it.
Ask
for three volunteers, to represent Guatemala , Mexico
, and the U.S. We are going to look at what happens
in the global economy by taking it down to a smaller
level to see how this definition applies to individual
countries. We'll take a look at the first section of
this definition. (reread the first underlined section
of the definition)
Hand
out a Mexican, Guatemalan, and US flags to the volunteers.
Looking
at each of your separate economies, your governments
are going to decide how much money to spend on health
care, education, how much to pay workers. (Give each
volunteer the money which represent health care, education,
workers salaries.) As a country you will also decide:
What
to produce
How
much to produce
The
price of you product or service.
So
for example, (pass out the props while explaining this)
Guatemala produces corn, oil, clothing, and also has
cheap labor. Mexico produces corn, oil, and cheap labor.
And the US produces corn, beef and automobiles.
You
can also decide whether or not you are going to sell
(export) your products to other countries and how much
you are going to charge other countries for selling
their goods to your citizens (import tax, hand out the
prop) and the amount of goods you are going to accept
from another country (quotas, hand out prop). You can
also decide how much support (subsidies, hand out the
props) you are going to give to farmers. Historically
this is how the global economy worked, as the definition
states; each country is deciding their own rules.
Now
lets move to the second part of this definition. (Reread
it to the group.) Can anyone guess what happens when
all the world economy becomes more globalized according
to the definition? (If they are having a hard time answering
ask them what the definition says about the rules?)
As
the definition says, becoming more globalized means
a more uniform set of rules regarding:
What
to produce
How
much to produce
The
price of your product or service
Whether
or not subsidies are given and for how much
Tariffs
and Quotas
Does
anyone know who decides these rules? (If they are having
trouble answering, ask them which of the three countries
do they think is most powerful?)
Based
on our discussion, how would the class define globalization?
|